Overview

Security Requirements for 03.01.17 Wireless Access Protection

Organizations authenticate individuals and devices to help protect wireless access to the system. Special attention is given to the wide variety of devices that are part of the Internet of Things with potential wireless access to organizational systems. See [NIST CRYPTO].

Assessment GuidanceExamine 0/7

How an assessor determines this requirement is met. Source: CMMC Assessment Guide – Level 2, Version 2.13 (NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2).

Discussion

Use a combination of authentication and encryption methods to protect the access to wireless networks. Authenticating users to a wireless access point can be achieved in multiple ways. The most common authentication and encryption methods used include:

WPA2-PSK (WiFi Protected Access-Pre-shared Key) – This method uses a password or passphrase known by the wireless access point and the client (user device). It is common in small companies that have little turnover because the key must be changed each time an employee leaves in order to prevent the terminated employee from connecting to the

network without authorization. WPA2 is typically configured to use Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) encryption.

WPA2 Enterprise – This method may be better for larger companies and enterprise networks because authentication is based on the identity of the individual user or device rather than a shared password or passphrase. It typically requires a Remote Authentication Dial-in User Service (RADIUS) server for authentication and can provide higher security than WPA2-PSK.

Open authentication must not be used because it authenticates any user and lacks security capabilities.

Because the use of cryptography in this requirement is to protect the confidentiality of CUI, the cryptography used must meet the criteria specified in requirement SC.L2-3.13.11. AC.L2-3.1.16, AC.L2-3.1.17, and AC.L2-3.1.18 are complementary requirements in that they all establish control for the connection of mobile devices and wireless devices through the use of authentication, authorization, and encryption mechanisms.

Examples

  1. Example 1

    You manage the wireless network at a small company and are installing a new wireless solution that may transmit CUI. You start by selecting a product that employs encryption validated against the FIPS 140 standard. You configure the wireless solution to use WPA2, requiring users to enter a pre-shared key to connect to the wireless network [a, b].

  2. Example 2

    You manage the wireless network at a large company and are installing a new wireless solution that may transmit CUI. You start by selecting a product that employs encryption that is validated against the FIPS 140 standard. Because of the size of your workforce, you configure the wireless system to authenticate users with a RADIUS server. Users must provide the wireless system with their domain usernames and passwords to be able to connect, and the RADIUS server verifies those credentials. Users unable to authenticate are denied access [a, b].

Assessment Methods

Examine
The process of reviewing, inspecting, observing, studying, or analyzing assessment objects (e.g., policies, procedures, plans, system designs, mechanisms) to facilitate understanding, achieve clarification, or obtain evidence.Example: An assessor reads the access control policy and inspects system configuration settings to confirm they match.

Not all of the evidence listed is required to meet this requirement — check the items your organization has collected.

Interview
The process of holding discussions with individuals or groups within an organization to facilitate understanding, achieve clarification, or identify the location of evidence.Example: An assessor asks a system administrator to describe how user accounts are approved, reviewed, and disabled.
  • System or network administrators
  • Personnel with information security responsibilities
  • System developers
Test
The process of exercising assessment objects (e.g., activities, mechanisms) under specified conditions to compare actual behavior with expected behavior.Example: An assessor attempts to sign in with a disabled account to confirm that access is denied.
  • Mechanisms implementing wireless access protections to the system

Potential Assessment Considerations

  • Is wireless access limited only to authenticated and authorized users (e.g., required to supply a username and password) [a]?
  • If the organization is securing its wireless network with a pre-shared key, is access to that key restricted to only authorized users [a]?
  • Is wireless access encrypted using FIPS-validated cryptography?
  • Note that simply using an approved algorithm is not sufficient; the module (software and/or hardware) used to implement the algorithm must be separately validated under FIPS 140 [b].

Key References

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2 3.1.17

Evidence

  1. 03.01.17.a

    Wireless access to the system is protected using authentication

  1. 03.01.17.b

    Wireless access to the system is protected using encryption